<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic GF1 &amp; Olympus E-P1 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sanweng.com/product-review/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/</link>
	<description>Photoshop Tutorial and Graphic Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: VCM</title>
		<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/comment-page-1/#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>VCM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanweng.com/?p=213#comment-4641</guid>
		<description>The quality of this &#039;review&#039; is obvious from the start: &quot;I had no prior experiences with other SLR until now.&quot; These are *not* SLRs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of this &#8216;review&#8217; is obvious from the start: &#8220;I had no prior experiences with other SLR until now.&#8221; These are *not* SLRs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4 dsi</title>
		<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/comment-page-1/#comment-4417</link>
		<dc:creator>r4 dsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanweng.com/?p=213#comment-4417</guid>
		<description>Panasonic GF1 is an excellent camera for its intended use--prosumer controls on a camera that is much lighter than a DSLR but not small enough to slip in the pockets in your shirt or pants. Outstanding build quality, flexible feature set, good but not superb low light performance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panasonic GF1 is an excellent camera for its intended use&#8211;prosumer controls on a camera that is much lighter than a DSLR but not small enough to slip in the pockets in your shirt or pants. Outstanding build quality, flexible feature set, good but not superb low light performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a little bit of everything&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/comment-page-1/#comment-4366</link>
		<dc:creator>a little bit of everything&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 16:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanweng.com/?p=213#comment-4366</guid>
		<description>[...] Panasonic GF1 and Olympus E-P1 comparison at http://sanweng.com/?p=213 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Panasonic GF1 and Olympus E-P1 comparison at <a href="http://sanweng.com/?p=213" rel="nofollow">http://sanweng.com/?p=213</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/comment-page-1/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanweng.com/?p=213#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>It took me about a month to learn to like the E-P1. I find the menu system to be particularly obtuse and inefficient. Focus is slow and the more I use the camera the more useless I think the +/- button is, and needs to be reprogrammed to do something else.

But, the built in IS is great with manual focus M lenses which make this format shine. The results I have with the inexpensive Nokton 40mm f1.4 match what I can get with my 5D and 135mm L with 1/4 the weight. For me the clintcher was the in-body IS. Lenses matter more than the camera - for the most part - and the E-P1 can make better use of lenses than the Panasonic. With a little practice and a bit of set-up the E-P1 makes a pretty decent manual focus system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me about a month to learn to like the E-P1. I find the menu system to be particularly obtuse and inefficient. Focus is slow and the more I use the camera the more useless I think the +/- button is, and needs to be reprogrammed to do something else.</p>
<p>But, the built in IS is great with manual focus M lenses which make this format shine. The results I have with the inexpensive Nokton 40mm f1.4 match what I can get with my 5D and 135mm L with 1/4 the weight. For me the clintcher was the in-body IS. Lenses matter more than the camera &#8211; for the most part &#8211; and the E-P1 can make better use of lenses than the Panasonic. With a little practice and a bit of set-up the E-P1 makes a pretty decent manual focus system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: efix</title>
		<link>http://www.sanweng.com/randomtopics/reviews/panasonic-gf1-olympus-e-p1-review-from-an-amature/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>efix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sanweng.com/?p=213#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>Since you&#039;re asking - I am a user of the E-P1 and I&#039;m very satisfied with it. Main reason for buying: interchangeable lenses, good low light capabilities (I love available light photography) and the new Lumix 20mm/F1.7 lens. Indeed, the camera is complicated at first and several gimmicks are hard to reach - but for me this is the perfect buy. Since I don&#039;t like using a flash, I don&#039;t miss it. And focus speed will be ok I guess, since I don&#039;t do action shot. Another bonus was the price: the E-P1 was released earlier, so there were good used ones on eBay for about 25% less than the original price. Also, Olympus does a great job in JPEG processing, from what I saw the GF1s output doesn&#039;t look as nice.
That said, I&#039;m sure it is only a matter of taste - both cameras seem to be great and do their job well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you&#8217;re asking &#8211; I am a user of the E-P1 and I&#8217;m very satisfied with it. Main reason for buying: interchangeable lenses, good low light capabilities (I love available light photography) and the new Lumix 20mm/F1.7 lens. Indeed, the camera is complicated at first and several gimmicks are hard to reach &#8211; but for me this is the perfect buy. Since I don&#8217;t like using a flash, I don&#8217;t miss it. And focus speed will be ok I guess, since I don&#8217;t do action shot. Another bonus was the price: the E-P1 was released earlier, so there were good used ones on eBay for about 25% less than the original price. Also, Olympus does a great job in JPEG processing, from what I saw the GF1s output doesn&#8217;t look as nice.<br />
That said, I&#8217;m sure it is only a matter of taste &#8211; both cameras seem to be great and do their job well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
